Implementation services · Physician-led EHR delivery
ReMedi Health Solutions
ReMedi Health Solutions is a physician-led healthcare IT consulting firm offering EHR implementation, personalization, chart abstraction, training, go-live, and optimization across Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, and related platforms. It is not an EHR product.
Strong fit
- Health systems that want physician informatics experts running EHR personalization and go-live coaching
- Epic or Oracle Health projects where moving chart data and peer training can delay go-live
- Buyers who track clinician adoption and efficiency after go-live, not only how many roles are filled
Weak fit
- Groups that only need basic go-live support staff, with no clinical coaching
- Buyers looking for a staffing marketplace with no delivery method
- Groups that will not pay for physician time in EHR setup sessions
Bottom line
ReMedi Health Solutions is worth using for health systems that see clinician adoption as the main risk in an EHR project. It suits buyers who want physician-led training and go-live coaching. Systems that need a larger consulting bench may prefer Tegria or Nordic.
Score breakdown
Weights: Outcomes 35% · Product 30% · Implementation 20% · Pricing clarity 15%.
ReMedi Health Solutions is a physician-led healthcare IT consulting firm. It focuses on EHR setup, personalization, moving chart data, training, and go-live support across Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, and related platforms.
It relies on peer-to-peer personalization and coaching rather than just adding staff. Clients point to survey scores and one-on-one sessions before go-live.
It is a delivery partner, not an EHR product.
Pricing is quoted per project and, as with most consulting, not published.
Among the consulting firms we review, ReMedi scores close to Ellit Groups for its clinician-focused approach, alongside larger firms.
Tegria or Nordic suit buyers who need a larger team. Ellit Groups suits buyers who want a smaller EHR delivery firm.
Competitor landscape
| Vendor | Overall | Speed to go-live |
|---|---|---|
| Tegria | 7.6 | 7.7 |
| Cumberland Consulting | 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Ellit Groups | 7.5 | 7.2 |
| ReMedi Health Solutions | 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Divurgent | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Nordic | 7.4 | 7.1 |
| Pivot Point Consulting | 7.3 | 7.1 |
| MedSys Group | 7.3 | 7.0 |
| HPG | 7.3 | 7.1 |
| Stoltenberg Consulting | 7.2 | 7.0 |
| Signature Consulting Group | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Morgan Hunter Healthcare | 7.1 | 6.9 |
| HealthTECH Resources | 6.9 | 6.8 |
| Ero Health | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Pricing
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Model | Physician-led EHR consulting, sold by project or as staffing, covering advice, training, go-live, moving chart data, and improvements. |
| What usually drives cost | Mix of physician informatics experts, how much chart data must move, go-live length, and which EHR vendor. |
| What to ask before you buy | The full cost of setup sessions and go-live weeks compared with basic go-live support staff, with named clinical leads in the statement of work. |
| Published pricing | ReMedi Health Solutions does not publish prices. |
Prerequisites for purchase
| Need | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| What you need to get ReMedi Health Solutions to function | |
| A named chief medical information officer or physician champion for personalization | Peer coaching stalls without a clinical owner. |
| A clear EHR vendor and go-live date | Vague timelines waste weeks of physician expert time. |
| Access to training systems and setup sessions | Personalization cannot happen in the live system alone. |
| A list of chart data to move and a map of where it lives | Missing problem, allergy, medication, and immunization lists cause chart chaos at go-live. |
| Your own application owners working beside consultants | Know-how leaves when the contract ends. |
| What will maximize your value | |
| Track finished personalization and clinician survey scores | Staff headcount is not adoption. |
| Finish moving chart data before go-live week | Looking things up in the old system wipes out the return. |
| Book 1:1 sessions by specialty, not only classroom hours | Specialty workflows differ. |
| Keep an owner for close support after go-live | Early tickets decide whether physicians stay happy. |
| Drop unofficial tip sheets once the new system is stable | Dual processes confuse staff. |
| Deal-breakers | |
| You only want unnamed go-live support staff with no clinical coaching. | |
| No physician time is paid for setup sessions. | |
| EHR vendor and go-live date are undecided. | |
| You cannot list which chart data must move. | |
| Leaders expect no change in how staff work. | |
Value creation time frame
| # | Stage | Typical range |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | From signing to kickoff | 2-4 weeks for security review, finishing the statement of work, and system access |
| 2 | From kickoff to the first group live or go-live support | 6-16 weeks, depending on how much personalization and chart data there is |
| 3 | From first use to steady results | 1-3 months of close support and improvements |
Methodology
| Weight | Factor | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Customer outcomes | Whether buyers get measurable operational or clinical-workflow results after go-live |
| 30% | Product | Capability depth, reliability, and fit for the job the category buys |
| 20% | Implementation | How hard it is to stand up, integrate, train, and stabilize |
| 15% | Pricing clarity | Whether a buyer can model total cost without a mystery quote |
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Highly recommend | Strong outcomes and product with manageable caveats |
| Recommend | Solid fit for the right buyer; know the tradeoffs |
| Conditional | Only with a specific use case or heavy caveats |
| Not recommended | Avoid for most buyers in this category |
Read our full methodology for how we weight scores and assign recommend labels.