Ellit Groups vs ReMedi Health Solutions
Updated October 16, 2026
Health systems planning an EHR go-live or a round of optimization often compare Ellit Groups and ReMedi Health Solutions. Ellit Groups mixes advisory, implementation, and IT staffing across EHR and other enterprise systems, while ReMedi puts physician informaticists in front of clinicians for personalization, training, and go-live coaching. Breadth of IT help and depth of clinical coaching pull in different directions.
Our analysts compared Ellit Groups and ReMedi Health Solutions on clinical coaching, staffing range, EHR platforms covered, knowledge transfer, and engagement style, using the HIR review of each company and the Ellit Groups news page. In the following sections, we compare them in one table, describe the health system each fits, and note Ellit's news this year.
Ellit Groups vs ReMedi Health Solutions at a glance, October 2026
| What buyers weigh | Ellit Groups | ReMedi Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Consulting and health IT staffing, sold as projects or as contract staff. | Physician-led EHR consulting, sold by project or as staffing, covering advice, training, go-live, moving chart data, and improvements. |
| What drives cost | How much is advice, build work, or staffing, how long named consultants stay, and which systems are involved. | Mix of physician informatics experts, how much chart data must move, go-live length, and which EHR vendor. |
| Main job | Advisory plus implementation and HIT staffing in one partner. | Physician informaticists running personalization, chart abstraction, and go-live coaching. |
| After go-live | Strong for organizations optimizing after go-live, not only standing up a first EHR. | Strong when clinician adoption and after-go-live efficiency are the main risk, not only staffing fill rates. |
| Delivery outcomes | Scores 7.7 on delivery outcomes after go-live. | Scores 7.8 on clinician adoption and personalization outcomes. |
| Product / method depth | Scores 7.6 on advisory and optimization depth across EHR, ERP, and ITSM. | Scores 7.6 on EHR lifecycle delivery depth with a clinically shaped posture. |
| Knowledge transfer | Scores 7.2; buyers who care about candid staff swaps when performance slips are a strong fit. | Scores 7.3 on leaving your staff able to run the change. |
| Getting value live | Optimization or staffing value in about 4-12 weeks; major builds take longer. | First live cohort or go-live support in about 6-16 weeks depending on personalization and abstraction volume. |
| Where it does not fit | Buyers who only want the cheapest staff-augmentation bench. | Organizations that only need commodity at-the-elbow bodies without clinical coaching. |
| Time to full value | About 3 to 10 months | About 3 to 8 months |
| What you need first | Clear program goals, not just staff hours. | A named chief medical information officer or physician champion for personalization. |
| Deal-breaker | You only want the cheapest contract staff. | You only want unnamed go-live support staff with no clinical coaching. |
| Pricing clarity score | 7.0 | 6.9 |
| HIR overall score | 7.5, Recommend. | 7.5, Recommend. |
| Best for | Health systems that want advisory plus implementation and HIT staffing in one partner. | Health systems that want physician informaticists running personalization and go-live coaching. |
| Not a fit for | Buyers who only want the cheapest staff-augmentation bench. | Organizations that only need commodity at-the-elbow bodies without clinical coaching. |
Which fits which buyer
Decide whether your clinicians or your IT team need the most help.
Choose Ellit Groups if
- You want one partner for advisory, implementation, and staffing.
- Your project spans the EHR, ERP, and service desk.
- Knowledge transfer to your staff is a contract goal.
Choose ReMedi Health Solutions if
- Physician adoption is your biggest risk.
- You want informaticists who coach clinicians at the elbow.
- Chart abstraction and personalization need doing before go-live.
Verdict
The two tie on our score, so the gap you need filled decides it. Ellit suits broad IT programs, and ReMedi suits projects where clinician adoption is the hard part.
Ask both for references from a go-live on your EHR.
Where the two tools are headed in 2027 and beyond
Ellit Groups: Ellit Groups appointed Jason Zawodzinski to lead its contact center and service management work on July 27, 2026.
Meet the actual consultants before you sign.
Methodology
Each row comes from the HIR reviews of Ellit Groups and ReMedi Health Solutions, scored under the HIR method, and from each vendor's public pricing where it exists. Any published price for Ellit Groups or ReMedi Health Solutions was checked on that vendor's own site on October 16, 2026.
A green check marks a clear edge for Ellit Groups or ReMedi Health Solutions only where their review scores differ by at least 0.3 points or the two reviews show a plain difference. Rows with nothing published for either Ellit Groups or ReMedi Health Solutions are left out, and time to full value for each adds up the rollout stages in its review.