Patient engagement & telehealth · Remote patient monitoring
HealthSnap
HealthSnap is virtual care management software that runs remote patient monitoring and chronic care management with cellular devices, EHR integration, and optional HealthSnap nurses.
Strong fit
- Health systems and physician groups that want remote monitoring and chronic care management run with the vendor's nurses
- Primary care and cardiology programs that want cellular devices connected to the EHR
- Organizations adding advanced primary care management to remote monitoring
Weak fit
- Small practices that want software only, with no vendor staff
- Teams that want to choose and buy their own devices
- Buyers who need a published price list
Bottom line
HealthSnap is a Miami, Florida company that runs remote patient monitoring and chronic care management for health systems and physician groups. Patients take readings on cellular devices at home, and HealthSnap's nurses or the practice's own staff review them in software connected to the EHR. Organizations pick it when they want a vendor to run the program day to day.
Score breakdown
Weights: Outcomes 35% · Product 30% · Implementation 20% · Pricing clarity 15%.
Samson Magid co-founded HealthSnap in 2015 with Chase Preston and Wesley Smith, out of University of Miami research on improving health through lifestyle and technology. Magid says the idea came from his grandfather, whose heart failure and type 2 diabetes went largely unmonitored between appointments.
HealthSnap launched remote patient monitoring in 2019 and later added chronic care management.
Its software takes readings from cellular blood pressure cuffs, scales, and glucose meters. Its own clinical team can enroll patients and make the monthly calls.
HealthSnap raised a $25 million Series B led by Sands Capital in February 2024, which brought total funding to $48.5 million.
In August 2026 it added a $25 million debt facility from Eastward Capital Partners. HealthSnap says it works with more than 200 health systems and physician organizations.
Health Recovery Solutions fits a health system that needs monitoring after discharge and hospital care at home.
Prevounce Health fits a smaller practice that wants help with billing rules. Smart Meter fits a team that only needs cellular devices for its own software.
Competitor landscape
| Vendor | Overall | Ease of implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Health Recovery Solutions | 7.8 | 7.6 |
| CoachCare | 7.6 | 7.5 |
| HealthSnap | 7.5 | 7.6 |
| Prevounce Health | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Tenovi | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Smart Meter | 7.0 | 7.1 |
| Vivo Care | 6.9 | 7.6 |
| ThoroughCare | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Pricing
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Model | A monthly price per patient, quoted by HealthSnap. Devices and nursing services are included or added. |
| What usually drives cost | Number of enrolled patients, which programs are used, and whether HealthSnap nurses or practice staff do the monthly work. |
| What to ask before you buy | Price per enrolled patient per month, what the nursing service covers, and device replacement costs. |
| Published pricing | HealthSnap does not publish a price list. |
Prerequisites for purchase
| Need | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| What you need to get HealthSnap to function | |
| A way to connect to the EHR | Readings and time logs need to reach the chart. |
| A decision on who calls patients | Either HealthSnap nurses or practice staff. |
| A list of patients who qualify | Programs depend on finding patients who qualify. |
| Physician approval of alert limits | Nurses need agreed limits for each reading. |
| A billing owner | Claims depend on documented time. |
| What will maximize your value | |
| Begin with uncontrolled hypertension | Results are easy to measure. |
| Use HealthSnap nurses for monthly calls at first | Practice staff can take over later. |
| Track blood pressure control by clinic | This shows which sites benefit. |
| Deal-breakers | |
| No physician will approve it | |
| It cannot get EHR access | |
| You want software only | |
Value creation time frame
| # | Stage | Typical range |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Contract and EHR connection | 3-6 weeks |
| 2 | First patient group | 4-8 weeks |
| 3 | Practice-wide rollout | 2-4 months |
Leadership
Methodology
| Weight | Factor | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Customer outcomes | Whether buyers get measurable operational or clinical-workflow results after go-live |
| 30% | Product | Capability depth, reliability, and fit for the job the category buys |
| 20% | Implementation | How hard it is to stand up, integrate, train, and stabilize |
| 15% | Pricing clarity | Whether a buyer can model total cost without a mystery quote |
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Highly recommend | Strong outcomes and product with manageable caveats |
| Recommend | Solid fit for the right buyer; know the tradeoffs |
| Conditional | Only with a specific use case or heavy caveats |
| Not recommended | Avoid for most buyers in this category |
Read our full methodology for how we weight scores and assign recommend labels.