HPG vs MedSys Group
Updated October 16, 2026
Health systems running Oracle Health often compare HPG and MedSys Group when they need outside consultants. Both staff application analysts and support systems after go-live, but HPG also works on Epic and MEDITECH and is known for revenue cycle help, while MedSys is strong in keeping older systems running during a long move to a new EHR. The scores tie, so the shape of your project decides.
Our analysts compared HPG and MedSys Group on EHRs covered, revenue cycle work, legacy support, federal experience, backing, and knowledge transfer, using the HIR review of each firm. In the following sections, we compare the firms, describe the project each suits, and close with a verdict.
HPG vs MedSys Group at a glance, October 2026
| What buyers weigh | HPG | MedSys Group |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Healthcare IT consulting and staffing for Oracle Health, Cerner, and related EHR work, sold by work order or by the hour. | Hourly or project-based consulting. Rates vary by role and security clearance needs. |
| What drives cost | Consultant experience, which modules are covered, how long the work lasts, and whether it is building, improving, or supporting older systems. | Which modules, how long, named senior consultants, and federal security clearance when needed. |
| EHRs covered | Oracle Health, Epic, and MEDITECH. Clear edge | Oracle Health Millennium first, including Command Center and Revenue Cycle. |
| Revenue cycle work | Revenue cycle consulting is one of its main strengths, beside application support. Clear edge | Offers Oracle Health Revenue Cycle work as part of its suite. |
| Keeping the old system running during a move | Provides long-term application support. | Ran Cerner Millennium for Memorial Hermann while its internal team moved to Epic. Clear edge |
| Federal work | Does not describe a federal practice. | Serves the VA hospital network and the Department of Defense, with security clearances. Clear edge |
| Backing | Independent firm. | Part of CSI Companies, which is owned by Recruit Holdings, the parent of Indeed. Clear edge |
| Leaving your staff able to run it | Scores 7.1. | Scores 7.0. |
| Time to full value | About 3 to 7 months | Not published |
| What you need first | Named application owners for each part of Millennium. | A defined Oracle Health (Cerner) project with an executive sponsor. |
| Deal-breaker | You need a large Epic-only firm to lead a huge program. | You are Epic-only and will not hire Oracle Health specialists. |
| Pricing clarity score | 6.8 | 6.9 |
| HIR overall score | 7.3, Recommend. | 7.3, Recommend. |
| Best for | Hospitals running Oracle Health / Cerner that need retained application and revenue-cycle consultants. | Organizations that need legacy EHR support during a multi-year transition. |
| Not a fit for | Epic-only programs looking for an Epic-first firm. | Buyers who want a fixed bid with no named consultants. |
Which fits which buyer
Describe your next two years of EHR work before you call either.
Choose HPG if
- You need revenue cycle consultants as well as application analysts.
- You run Epic or MEDITECH alongside Oracle Health.
- You want an independent firm on a long retainer.
Choose MedSys Group if
- You need someone to run the old system while your team moves to Epic.
- You serve VA or Department of Defense facilities.
- You want the backing of a larger staffing group.
Verdict
HPG suits hospitals that want long-term application and revenue cycle support across several EHRs. MedSys fits systems in the middle of a multiyear move that need legacy coverage or federal experience.
Insist on named consultants in either statement of work.
Methodology
Each row comes from the HIR reviews of HPG and MedSys Group, scored under the HIR method, and from each vendor's public pricing where it exists. Any published price for HPG or MedSys Group was checked on that vendor's own site on October 16, 2026.
A green check marks a clear edge for HPG or MedSys Group only where their review scores differ by at least 0.3 points or the two reviews show a plain difference. Rows with nothing published for either HPG or MedSys Group are left out, and time to full value for each adds up the rollout stages in its review.